Stewart Smith wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 08:27:45AM -0700, Brian Aker wrote:
Hi!
On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Stewart Smith wrote:
lowest level, probably just access via number. the naming of
parameters
I suspect that number binding is simpler to screw up for the average
developer, compared to name binding.
Very much agree... do we want to expose both interfaces or just a name one?
The number binding is very cumbersome. If the query is not known at
design time and is composed on the fly for things like report makers,
keeping track of the numbering scheme is extremely cumbersome. If you
could bind values using a name, and only once for all occurrences of the
name, it would be great.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
