Stewart Smith wrote:
Having two sets of ENUMs for types just seems stupid.

well... three really (including libdrizzle).

Ideas for synergy?

Maybe just what's in the proto?

Yeah, it's annoying. I have conversion routines in replication_services.cc and also the statement_transform.cc files, both of which must translate between the serialized field type enum in the GPB message and the internal enum...

I would support dropping the non-GPB enum, but that is impossible until the field merge and conversion arrays go bye-bye.

-jay

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to