Hi Jay,
I think you may have just confirmed that the integration has caused no
significant regression.
Make sure you tested with --engine=pbxt
On Nov 11, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hi!
So, after pulling the latest pbxt drizzle branch and compiling --
with-debug, I'm getting only a single test case failure:
main.variables [ fail ] --- /home/jpipes/repos/
drizzle/drizzle-pbxt-2/tests/r/variables.result 2009-11-11
20:31:41.000000000 +0300
+++ /home/jpipes/repos/drizzle/drizzle-pbxt-2/tests/r/
variables.reject 2009-11-11 21:29:53.000000000 +0300
@@ -587,6 +587,8 @@
set global flush_time =...@my_flush_time;
ERROR HY000: Unknown system variable 'flush_time'
set global key_buffer_size =...@my_key_buffer_size;
+Warnings:
+Error 1292 Truncated incorrect key_buffer_size value: '8'
set global max_connect_errors =...@my_max_connect_errors;
set global max_heap_table_size =...@my_max_heap_table_size;
set global max_join_size =...@my_max_join_size;
drizzletest: Result content mismatch
I'm a little unsure why on Earth this would occur, considering PBXT
doesn't use the key_buffer_size variable :) But, I will investigate
further and push a fix when I find out.
I think the next step would be to set up a dedicated Hudson build
for PBXT and hook into the performance regression system too. The
regression system is a great way to track your performance.
We don't have that yet for PBXT, so that would be excellent!
Cheers!
jay
--
Paul McCullagh
PrimeBase Technologies
www.primebase.org
www.blobstreaming.org
pbxt.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
