On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 11:24:53AM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > Yep, makes sense. Basically, what you are doing is removing the > legacy confusion around a "normal transaction" and a "statement > transaction", and the need for the ha_register_trans() stuff, > passing false for a statement transaction.
We should also think about savepoints (i.e. nested transactions) -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
