On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:50:40PM -0800, Brian Aker wrote: > On Dec 14, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > Right, but this is NOT what Stewart has proposed for the > > AlterTable statement. Stewart (and Stewart, correct me if I'm wrong) > > would like to send the *actions* that the master executed for the > > Alter Table. I am opposed to this (see link above for the ML post > > with my reasons why) > > Agreed, I would not want to send the actions. That would be > completely unportable.
How so? You can go from actions to SQL easily. You can also use the actions to simply write code that does the alter on non-sql systems (e.g. an applier that just uses Embedded InnoDB) -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
