On 03/01/2010 03:38 PM, Tim Soderstrom wrote:
Hi All!
I noticed that the 'drizzle' command-line client reads
/etc/drizzle.cnf but not /etc/drizzled.cnf. That makes sense (in fact
I updated the Connecting with Drizzle section on Wiki to explain
this) but since there are still config sections on the dirzzled.cnf
(namely [drizzled]) is this adding more complexity than is needed?
Because my drizzle.cnf file has a [drizzle] section in it, but if
that is all I need, it seems like the two could just share the same
config file?
I assume there was some reasoning behind this but thought I'd ask the
question. Besides the list has been too quiet as of late :)
I'm not sure there is specific reasoning behind this. I don't have a
strong feeling either way, other than not wanting it to read my.cnf. :)
I'd be just as happy if everything used /etc/drizzle/drizzle.cnf. I am
_VERY_ tempted to remove any implicit support for /etc/drizzle.cnf or
/etc/drizzled.cnf without the /etc/drizzle subdir - but that's sort of a
different question...
Monty
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
