Hi!
At this point all we need is:
{
protobuf;
init();
variable_init();
}
Using the protobuf pretty much means we can skip everything else.
And like Jeremy pointed out... URL! I hadn't thought about that till
today. I don't want to have to keep adjusting the structure every time
we think of something new.
Cheers,
-Brian
On Mar 8, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Eric Day wrote:
The only concern here is that we need a struct that can be dlopen()ed,
we don't want to have a proper class with constructor for this type of
information. We could have a struct that contains a function pointer
(you should not dlym functions directly), and then that function can
produce the protobuf. Seems like a few more hoops to jump through,
but versioned structs may be as well. Depends on how often we really
think we'll need to change this. :)
-Eric
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:53:23PM -0800, Brian Aker wrote:
Hi!
What would folks think about having plugins return a protobuf
message saying "this is me"?
We have LICENSE, Author, etc... and I suspect we will continue to
extend it.
Thoughts? Love it? Hate it?
Cheers,
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp