Hi!

At this point all we need is:

{
  protobuf;
  init();
  variable_init();
}

Using the protobuf pretty much means we can skip everything else.

And like Jeremy pointed out... URL! I hadn't thought about that till today. I don't want to have to keep adjusting the structure every time we think of something new.

Cheers,
        -Brian

On Mar 8, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Eric Day wrote:

The only concern here is that we need a struct that can be dlopen()ed,
we don't want to have a proper class with constructor for this type of
information. We could have a struct that contains a function pointer
(you should not dlym functions directly), and then that function can
produce the protobuf. Seems like a few more hoops to jump through,
but versioned structs may be as well. Depends on how often we really
think we'll need to change this. :)

-Eric

On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:53:23PM -0800, Brian Aker wrote:
Hi!

What would folks think about having plugins return a protobuf
message saying "this is me"?

We have LICENSE, Author, etc... and I suspect we will continue to
extend it.

Thoughts? Love it? Hate it?

Cheers,
        -Brian

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to