And I suppose you could even have a MIN_STORE_BYTES and MAX_STORE_BYTES. That would be quite useful for applications or scripts doing provisioning and capacity planning, I think :)
-jay On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 8:29 PM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Mar 12, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: >> >>> I'm going to vote for bytes. The char-length is already listed in the type >>> column (varchar(64)) ... although it could be argued that the user could >>> just know "int - that's 4 bytes" ... if the byte-count was listed in the >>> table it would make some reporting nice/easy. >> >> Do you report the correct size? For instance VARCHAR is always +2. > > Yeah, I'd say so. perhaps MAX_STORE_BYTES? > > -jay > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
