> > Though I have already started working on the filesystem plugin idea, I > doubt that this plugin is VERY useful to users of drizzle. How do you take > this? In this respect, do you think the column-based archive storage engine > would benefit drizzle community more than filesystem engine? > > The filesystem based one would be useful for two reasons.
It would make a much better "example" template for storage engines than the current storage engines, and thus spur the development of still more storage engines. And a filesystem based storage engine would be useful on clustered filesystem appliances, such as Isilon and NetApp fileservers, which are currently not very good for storage engines such as InnoDB.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
