Depends if you want to monitor your database or not eh...? ;)
On 6 Sep 2010, at 21:20, David Shrewsbury wrote:
We could change it to force a table name to be specified, then load
that
table info into the cache. How useful is it for someone to want to
see the
status of ALL of their tables at once?
-Dave
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Andrew Hutchings <[email protected]
> wrote:
Hi guys,
I have been looking into the following bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/drizzle/+bug/622472
Basically SHOW TABLE STATUS ignores tables that are not already in
the table
cache. I can't really see a solution to this unless we fill the
table cache
with what could be useless entries.
Anyone have an idea for a solution for this? Or should it be
documented
that way.
Kind Regards
--
Andrew Hutchings - LinuxJedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Best regards
Mark
--
Mark Leith
Software Development Senior Manager
MySQL Enterprise Tools @ Oracle Corp.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
