On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 22:55:30 +0300, Henrik Ingo <henrik.i...@avoinelama.fi> wrote: > You could add some kind of authentication or security to HandlerSocket > though, but the real reason this couldn't be a GSoC project is that > HandlerSocket is not actually in Drizzle yet. So the only server-side > GSoC project we would be interested in is to port Memcache API (rather > than HandlerSocket) to Drizzle.
Honestly, I think a full REST API is going to be a whole lot better than ever having handlersocket itself. Why? It'll get used a lot more. -- Stewart Smith _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : drizzle-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
