On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 11:10 -0500, Ryan McKinley wrote: > On Nov 6, 2008, at 10:55 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > I would like to start working on a HttpClient 4.0 based implementation > > of the ProtocolHandler as the next step. I would like to ask a few > > questions before get down to coding > > > > (1) Would anyone object to using URI class instead of URL in the > > Droids > > public API? We ought not use URL class unless we are planning to use > > it > > to retrieve the content that location is pointing at. We have our own > > content retrieval abstraction, namely ProtocolHandler. URL class seems > > unnecessary. This would also help keep consistency with HttpClient 4.0 > > API > > Agreed, URI is better. Also, the Link API uses getURI() > > > > > (2) Should I keep the existing HttpBase and Http classes? > > > > For now, I think you should design what you think the best interface > will be. If it matches the HttpBase & Http class, then great -- > otherwise it can and should change.
+1 totally agree. salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler thorsten.at.apache.org Open Source Java consulting, training and solutions
