Every ASF committer that has demonstrated his/her commitment to droids
through the normal meritocracy policy we have on the ASF will be voted
in from all active PMC members.
New droids developer (non-ASF committers) are need to demonstrate
his/her commitment through the normal meritocracy policy we have on
the
ASF. If they get voted in as committer their should as well become
part
of the PMC since if they are committed to the project they should have
as well a binding vote."
WDYT?
I suggest we let any ASF committer who *wants* to be a committer on
droids be a committer. Unless there are tons of requests to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I'm not sure I see the value it having global write access.
As for the PMC, I'm fine with every committer being on the PMC (though
- of course - it does not make sense if all ASF committers are on the
PMC). But I think this will depend more on if it becomes a TLP or sub
project. In practice I don't see it really making a difference, as
Grant noted, every vote I have seen (in solr) does not treat PMC/
committers/public any different -- a -1 is usually a -1 for good reason.
In my opinion, the only need for a semi-private group dedicated to
droids is to discuss and decide what non-committers should become
committers.
I think we can use the droids committer status as a way to signify
commitment/involvement in a project rather then a way to exclude
contribution. I think we can have an inclusive committer policy
without tossing the general model.
ryan
