On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 13:14 +0800, Mingfai wrote: > > > >>> just wonder how we should proceed. how about I just create an issue for > >>> every point discussed about and start making the changes that are agreed? > >>> > >>> > >> +1, but looks like you are already at it ;) > >> > >> Sorry for the slow replies on everything.... I have been swamped. > >> > >> ryan > >> > > > > thx. i wonder if you guys want me to tag a 0.0.1 version before i make any > > change that might break existing code. (e.g. change Task to extend Map), or > > I could just start a crawler module without changing the core first. (and > > let the original developer to change?) > > > > p.s. pls disregard one of my previous point about Crawler extend Task > > Master, any Crawler should extend Droids instead and has a Task Master. > > Basically, stuff like Task Master is needed by the crawler but it's not sth > > a crawler should concern too much about. So it is perfect for the crawler to > > use the Task Master and Queue in the core. > > > > regards, > > mingfai > > > > > let me make a droids-crawler module and not to make change to the core > first. this makes less impact.
Please do the tag. so we have something "stable" and then go nuts. ;) salu2 -- Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org> Open Source Java <consulting, training and solutions> Sociedad Andaluza para el Desarrollo de la Sociedad de la Información, S.A.U. (SADESI)
