Great, we will be happy to help as much as possible. I also would like an
address to contact you, because my mail server (softhome) always returns
the mails I write to you to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I guess we will have issues
to talk out of the list.
Thanks,
Marc
bob mcwhirter writes:
> > Hello, my name is Marc Carrion,
>
> Howdy Marc!
>
> > I'm working in a project that needs some inference engine, by now
> > Drools is the framework that fill more of our requests. We would like
> > to colaborate with you, if possible, in the developing of Drools.
>
> Absolutely. All are welcome.
>
> Right now, I'm the only one hacking the code, and no one else has
> volunteered. Understanding the Rete algorithm (and my Rete-OO adaptation)
> seems to be the biggest impediment.
>
> > Our team is composed by twenty people and we can develop our own
> > inference engine but we wanted to do something standard most useful than
> > only for our project. So we thought in RuleML in order to represent our
> > facts and rules.
>
> drools v1.0 had its own java-derived language. v2.x has explicitly
> avoided having the engine care at all about the rule specification
> language. It should be possible, I think, to create a RuleML driver
> to load the rules into the engine.
>
> I really need to do more research on RuleML.
>
> Anyhow, adding things like RuleML to drools would layer nicely
> on top of the current logic engine, and wouldn't require any
> knowledge of Rete, really. The only interface point you'd
> have to worry about is the org.drools.spi.* classes and
> interfaces.
>
> -bob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> drools-interest mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
