Yah, that's about what I've gotten out of the proposal.
I see that it narrowly got approved, "with strong reservations" from
most of the voting members.
But still, what does it mean?
Is it a standardization of the assert(..) retract(..) and
modify(..) actions of working with facts within a working memory?
Or is it even higher-level of loadRule(..) types of things?
I just don't have enough details to really decide. Chances are, once
the spec is released, I'll try to conform, unless it's a brain-dead JSR,
like the EJB spec. ;)
(yes, I'm a tad punchy and will probably start a flame war with
that, but...)
-bob
On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Stuart Schmukler wrote:
> Bob,
>
> As I understand it JSR 92 is now a standard API
> for controling a rules engine. The language of the
> rules engine is not specified. The RuleML work is
> an attempt to create a common XML based rules language.
>
> Stuart Schmukler (SaS)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> drools-interest mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
>
_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
