To be honest, no clue.
JESS still seems non-OO, to me, in that you're still writing
cambridge-prefix types of rules. It's interpreted, as
is the Java Semantic Module of drools, so it may be similar.
I do think JESS has highly optimized their Rete network,
though, so they may beat us.
Someone want to do some benchmarking for us?
-bob
(the great delegator)
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Dhanwa Thirumalai wrote:
> Another java 'rete' engine JESS is getting popular. How does drools
> compare with Jess in terms performance and functionality?
>
> Dhanwa.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> drools-interest mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
>
_______________________________________________
drools-interest mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
