Hold on...
If you're seeing that behaviour, then it's a bug. I've been gone for a week, so I'll get around to responding to all questions, but... drools is fully rete-enabled, included Join nodes that maintain a both a left and right input memory, allowing for complex, multiple conditions to be matched. There are probably bugs here'n'there, but I'm rapidly attemping to squish them. PLEASE: Use http://jira.werken.com/ to report any suspected bugs, so I can keep track of what needs work. -bob On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, John Pritchard wrote: > > hi again mahi, > > in its current version, the rules engine can only process > rules of one > condition, as one can only assert one fact at a time and > each fact is > simply propagated. there is no facility to hold onto > partially matched > rules for subsequent facts' assertion. > > john > > > > HI Danny > > I have a rule where in I declared 2 parameters of the types - Type1 > > and Type2. > > > > I tried asserting the objects of Type1 and Type2 separtately. But > > the rule is not getting evaluated. > > If the rule has only one parameter of a certain type and when I > > assert the objects of that type, only then the rule is getting evaluated. > > > > What if the Action part uses parameters of Both the types? > > > > Thanx > > mahi > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > drools-interest mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest > -- Bob McWhirter [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Werken Company http://werken.com/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ drools-interest mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/drools-interest
