Hi, On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 02:18, Stuart Longland wrote: > I wonder if this could be due to some Cygwin quirk? I know for a fact > that fork() is quite an expensive operation in Cygwin (no > copy-on-write), and I hear its threadding support is somewhat primitive.
I'd say that one call to fork() is neglectable. The real problem is the network performance during file transfer through the tunnel. Michael
