On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:22:13PM +0100, Daniel Cegiełka wrote: > Thank you Matt! Thank you Adam! :) > > btw. can we use qhasm version as an option for x86 (curve25519)?
Hi Daniel, Is x86 performance an issue with the current code? Binary size might be a reason to use the asm version, though probably on other CPUs? Generally I'd prefer to keep it portable and relatively readable. Cheers, Matt
