On Wednesday 11 December 2013 08:55:54 Matt Johnston wrote: > On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 08:26:43PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > there's no need to do `rm; ln` when `ln -f` will do the same thing > > It's not always the same, I dislike "ln -f". For example: > > ln -s /tmp foo > ln -sf /etc/hosts foo > cat foo
GNU/coreutils' ln has the -T flag specifically for this purpose, but it means
you won't be portable. seems weird though that someone would be doing
something dumb like:
ln -s /tmp /usr/bin/dropbear
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
