Hi Stephen, On Mon, January 20, 2014 1:47 pm, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > Just a health-check on this list. Anyone got plans?
Thanks for the prod. Are HMAC_DRBG and CTR_DRBG suitable as general purpose DRBGs? If yes, then do people see value in producing an Informational RFC describing them? If not, what's the problem and what's a suitable alternative? thanks, Dan. _______________________________________________ dsfjdssdfsd mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dsfjdssdfsd
