Thanks for the pointer to the ETD group. That will be useful for more than 
just this question.

So far all the replies have been about ETDs. I'm dealing mostly with tech 
reposts. I'd like to hear how people are dealing with those. Often there 
will be signatures of those submitting the report, those approving the 
report, maybe a tech monitor or a compliance monitor, or the PI.

How far back should be a concern? If I'm scanning something from the 1960s, 
the 1990s or current, should they be treated differently? 

The trend in ETDs seems to redact signatures or even omit the signature 
page for current items. But not for older items. Many places also either 
redact or omit the Vita or CV.

Thanks,
Dave

On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 11:59:58 AM UTC-5, Kimberly Chapman wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> You may want to ask this question on the ETD Forum on Google Groups - the 
> forum discusses issues similar to what you ask above. 
> https://groups.google.com/a/ndltd.org/forum/#!forum/etd.
>
> Here at the University of Arizona, signatures are not provided as part of 
> the ETDs that are archived in ProQuest and our institutional repository - 
> the signature page is kept on file at the Graduate College, whereas an 
> empty signature page is included in the ETD.
>
> We also completed a retrospective digitization project - signatures were 
> not redacted, although that might have been something we would have 
> considered if we had resources to handle that at the time.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Kimberly Chapman
> Director, Campus Repository Services
> Office of Digital Innovation and Stewardship
> University of Arizona Libraries
> 520-349-7864
> [email protected] <javascript:>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:47 AM, David Bigwood <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Do you redact signatures in the documents you make available to the 
>> public? if so under what circumstances and what tools do you use?
>>
>> I notice the advisor signatures have been blacked out from some ETD 
>> repositories. Any guidelines you could point me to, so I could establish 
>> some for our institution?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David Bigwood
>> Lunar and Planetary Institute
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "DSpace Community" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-community.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-community.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to