Hi Mark,

Thank you for your recommendations. I suspected that these qualifiers would not 
be represented in the vocabularies, and I appreciate your recommendations. I 
may present dc.date.modified as an alternative, and we will consider the 
ramifications of making dc.date.original in regards to system interoperability. 
It is my concern, as well, that too many locally defined elements will make it 
difficult for harvesting and interaction with other repository systems.

If anyone has other recommended resources or examples from their system, I 
would appreciate it. I want to present a solid case for our group to consider.

Sincerely,

Rex Hughes


Rex Hughes, II, M.L.I.S.
Metadata and Cataloging Librarian
Resource Acquisition, Management, and Discovery
NDSU Libraries
Dept. 2080, PO Box 6050 / Fargo ND 58108-6050
Phone:701.231.9677 (Main Library 120G)
[ndsu_sig]



From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Wood
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:24 AM
To: DSpace Community <[email protected]>
Subject: [dspace-community] Re: DC Date Elements: Best Practices

On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 11:42:38 AM UTC-5, Hughes ll, Rex wrote:

Hello all,



I wanted to reach out to the community and ask for your recommendations 
regarding the DC Date element. Our common usage of DC Date include:



  *   dc.date.issued (publication of the object)
  *   dc.date.accessioned (resource accessioned into the system; auto-assigned)
  *   dc.date.available (date available to public; auto-assigned)
  *   dc.date.copyright (copyright date of the object)



We also have qualifiers in our schema for dc.date.created, dc.date.submitted, 
and dc.date.updated that have not been used consistently in the past.



We recently discussed using a qualifier of dc.date.original to differentiate 
between the original creation of the content and the publication date 
(dc.date.issued); however, I thought many institutions used dc.date.created in 
these instances. We did discuss how the term "created" might be confusing to 
some users regarding the kind of creation that occurs (creation of the document 
or creation of the repository object).




QDC doesn't define date.original.  
http://dublincore.org/documents/2000/07/11/dcmes-qualifiers/  If I were wanting 
a new meaning, I would, first, look around to see if someone has already 
defined it, and add that namespace if so; otherwise, create a local namespace 
and put it there.  Difficulties arise if you expose your metadata to harvesters 
and the like, because then it matters what other sites think your fields mean.

(I'm not a metadata expert, but I do have strong views on interoperability of 
networked systems.)


A second dilemma we came across was the correct qualifier to use for revised 
objects. There was an idea to use dc.date.issued.revised, but I am wondering if 
we should simply use dc.date.updated.




DSpace's operable metadata support only has two levels:  
schema.element.qualifier.  There's no way to create a sub-qualifier like that.  
You might consider QDC's date.modified.  If you find it unsuitable, then you 
might also look in DCTERMS http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ which 
supersedes QDC.  Recent DSpace versions come with a DCTERMS namespace.  There 
are other element.qualifier namespaces defined by various organizations, and 
DSpace makes it fairly easy to add such namespaces.


Thank you for your recommendations, and examples from your systems would be 
greatly appreciated. I am fairly new to our current system and would like to 
establish more consistent metadata practices than there have been in the past.



*applause*

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-community.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-community.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to