Hi all,

imo the tracking of known bugs should not be done in the Wiki but rather 
kept in a tracker system (whatever will be the new one) out of which 
wiki pages might be populated.

This assumes that we do keep track of changes on it. There is a tendency 
to submit patches and fix especially small bugs on the fly, without 
submitting a new tracker or close an existing one. These changes are 
lost to most of the community. Thus folk running into the same problem 
or searching for a certain funtionality have not even the possiblity to 
find out about it.

Maybe we'll find the time to have a go through the trackers and do a bit 
of cleanup. The average item age is not encouraging folk to submit new 
things.

Have a nice day

Claudia








Mark Diggory schrieb:
> Developers,
> 
> I've reached a point where I cannot take the the thought of  
> continuing what I consider to be rather "Archaic" practices of  
> maintaining KNOWN_BUGS files in the "dspace" directory.   I consider  
> these files as "always incomplete and out of date" information.  They  
> introduce an overhead for developers contributing changes, commiters  
> processing them and for the release manager to verify all has been  
> documented properly in.  To be honest, as a maintainer of a DSpace  
> instance and a developer, I never read these files, and instead  
> review the work done in the Tracker, WIKI and SVN logs.
> 
> http://dspace.svn.sf.net/svnroot/dspace/branches/dspace-1_5_x/dspace/ 
> KNOWN_BUGS
> 
> I would recommend a different approach for maintaining a more  
> accurate reference to the issues that have arisen since a DSpace  
> instance is released.  And this would be to setup appropriate WIki  
> pages which can be edited by users to document new issue as they  
> arise both before and after a release has been cut.  This will both  
> speed up the release process and provide a nice convention location  
> to track the issues and get appropriate feedback from our user-base.
> 
> http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/DSpace_Release_1.4.0_Notes
> http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/DSpace_Release_1.4.1_Notes
> http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/DSpace_Release_1.4.2_Notes
> http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/DSpace_Release_1.4.3_Notes
> http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/DSpace_Release_1.5.0_Notes
> http://wiki.dspace.org/index.php/DSpace_Release_1.5.1_Notes
> 
> It is my feeling that these URL's already provide an adequate jumping  
> point for discovering documentation on the KNOWN ISSUES in a DSpace  
> Version.  Would there be any argument with adopting the usage of  
> these for documenting these details rather than static files in the  
> SVN repository? The Static README File could then point into these  
> pages and thus allow the users of DSpace to take up a post release  
> documentation effort
> 
> It also seems these locations would be adequate for listing out the  
> CHANGES that have occurred, but I do like the process that listing  
> ones changes in the CHANGES file introduces into the community.   
> However, as the project grows and becomes more modular, listing  
> changes that may have happened in each separate component in one  
> centrally located file quickly becomes intractable.  So I would  
> recommend either doing away with the practice, or coming up with a  
> better way to list out the work that commiters have done in a  
> particular project using separate CHANGES (Or possibly just WIKI  
> pages like identified above).
> 
> What are the developers (and more explicitly the commiters) opinion  
> on this topic?
> 
> Sincerely,
> Mark Diggory
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager
> MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services
> Massachusetts Institute of Technology
> Home Page: http://purl.org/net/mdiggory/homepage
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Dspace-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel

Reply via email to