[
http://jira.dspace.org/jira/browse/DS-470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=11106#action_11106
]
Mark Diggory commented on DS-470:
---------------------------------
A agree with Grahams assessment here.
An a related tangent, there may be a possibility we would want to provide some
transactionality within the EventManager at some point. But I also recommend
that we are working to leave behind the EventManager in favor of the
EventService and Listeners as the mechanism for propagating events. We should
look into implementing EventListener shims that approach the same event
processing as the EventManager.
> Batch import times increase drastically as repository size increases; patch
> to mitigate the problem
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DS-470
> URL: http://jira.dspace.org/jira/browse/DS-470
> Project: DSpace 1.x
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: DSpace API
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0
> Reporter: Simon Brown
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: batch_importer_speedup.patch
>
>
> As mentioned by my colleague Tom De Mulder on dspace-tech and at
> http://tdm27.wordpress.com/2010/01/19/dspace-1-6-scalability-testing/
> As the repository grows, the time taken for batch imports to run also
> increases. Having profiled the importer in our 1.6.0-RC1 install we
> determined that most (80%-90%) of the time was spent in calls to
> IndexBrowse.pruneIndexes().
> The reason for this is that IndexBrowse.indexItem() calls pruneIndexes(), so
> every time an item is indexed, the indexes are pruned. For any batch of size
> n, where n > 1, this is (n - 1) times more than is necessary.
> Increasing the visibility of pruneIndexes(), removing the call from
> IndexBrowse.indexItem(), and making a single call at the end of the
> BrowseConsumer.end() method reduces this to once per event queue run.
> However, the batch importer calls Context.commit() after each item is
> imported. Context.commit() runs the event queue, thus causing one event queue
> run per imported item.
> This patch addresses both of these issues in a way which has a minimal effect
> on the rest of the code base; I don't necessarily consider it to be the
> "best" way, but I wanted to keep the patch small so it could be put out. What
> it does is:
> 1. create an IndexBrowse.indexItemNoPrune() method, which is called from the
> BrowseConsumer class instead of indexItem(). Other calls to indexItem() are
> not affected.
> 2. Call pruneIndexes() from BrowseConsumer.end()
> 3. Change the call in the batch importer from Context.commit() to
> Context.getDBConnection.commit(). The only effective difference between the
> two is that the event queue is not run; I think that a better solution might
> be to move the code to run the event queue from the Context.commit() method
> to the Context.complete() method, but I don't know what effect that will have
> on the rest of the code.
> As noted in Tom's blog post linked above, these changes, on a repository with
> in excess of 120,000 items, brought import time from 4.7 seconds/item down to
> 4.9 items/second.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.dspace.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation
Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business
Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts
Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel
