Bugs item #2171771, was opened at 2008-10-16 09:07
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by tdonohue
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=119984&aid=2171771&group_id=19984

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Claudia Juergen (cjuergen)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Withdraw and reinstantiate items might change their policies

Initial Comment:
On withdrawal of an item the associated policies are removed and on 
reinstantiation new policies are assigned based on the default settings of the 
collection.
These might differ from the orginial item policies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Claudia Juergen (cjuergen)
Date: 2009-03-04 06:51

Message:
Hi Andrea,

in case of withdrawn items, these should keep the policies associated with
them.

As for the other cases where policies change:

a) last bitstream from bundle original removed will remove the bundle
original, on adding new bitstream the bundle will be recreated

Here the bundle should not be removed and it's policies kept, so that the
newly added bitstream inherits these policies. This should be accompanied
by a not if the policies from the bundle diverge from the default policies

b) on item creation, no bundle created (skip file upload)
In this case the bundle should derive it's policies from the
default_item_read similar to a new submission.

Claudia


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrea Bollini (bollini)
Date: 2009-03-04 04:06

Message:
Hi Claudia,
what do you think that should be the right behaviour?
Keep the previous policies can be difficult because we need to handle it
in a different way than the standard (also if the policy gives access to
the resource we need to prevent it because the resource is withdrawn...)
Do you think that a note/warning would be appropriate and solve this
issue? 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=119984&aid=2171771&group_id=19984

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel

Reply via email to