Title: Message Title
|
|
|
|
|
I can't think why different DBMSs would *require* different DROP orders. If there is a dependency, it should be dependent regardless of DBMS brand. More likely: different brands try to be "helpful" in different ways not determined by the SQL standard, and so are forgiving in different ways when we don't write according to standard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running the clean_database ant target against an oracle database still does not produce a "clean" database. A few tables are missed, due to foreign key contraints, which would be helped by changing the order of tables being deleted. Also, a few related sequences are not deleted, not sure why. Manually cleaning up the DB (via drop table, drop sequence, etc...
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dspace-devel mailing list
Dspace-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-devel
