Hi Peter,

Thanks for your thoughts on this. I do definitely see that many times, 
things still "work" in Google Scholar (and that's good to see).

However, I will mention that I've immediately found examples from 
kb.OSU.edu where things didn't "work" as expected, and the "abstract" 
reported by Google Scholar is actually text from the PDF coverpage.

For example:

"Mycorrhizae and establishment of trees on strip-mined land"
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=3612920260665530599&hl=en&as_sdt=0,36

This becomes even more visible if you search for text that appears in 
the cover page itself. For example "Downloaded from the Knowledge Bank" 
appears in your PDF cover page:

Finds ~243,000 results with this text in the "abstract" field:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Downloaded+from+the+Knowledge+Bank&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C36

It does look like Google Scholar is smart enough to generally grab the 
Title, Author and even date from the cover page itself (so assuming they 
are spelled correctly in the DSpace metadata, that is great!). But, the 
abstract seems to be problematic, so some of your articles may not have 
as much "visibility" in that they may be only searchable by Title, 
Author and Date.

This is just something to consider if Google Scholar visibility is of 
high importance to your researchers/users. There definitely are some 
issues here, even with a well-formatted Cover Page.

- Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Dspace-general mailing list
Dspace-general@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-general

Reply via email to