Evgeni, The default behavior of the facets and filters will not accomplish your goal.
There is a feature called a Hierarchical Sidebar Facet that might help. I have not used this feature, so I do not know if it will help with your issue. https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSDOC5x/Discovery#Discovery-Hierarchical(taxonomiesbased)sidebarfacets I believe we attempted something like what you are trying to accomplish. We settled for what we could achieve with the default facet options. In our repository, we have a community of MOOC courses. It is faceted by course name. Each course lives in a separate collection. (Since each course it distinct, it made sense to place each one in its own collection.) https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/710899 If you navigate to a collection, the collection content is faceted by week of the course. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/712963 Unfortunately, if you follow the course facet, you do not see the week facet because you are still at the community level. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/710899/discover?filtertype=gu-course&filter_relational_operator=equals&filter=Genomic+Medicine+Gets+Personal-GeorgetownX-MEDX202-01 Terry On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Evgeni Dimitrov <dimitrove....@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you Terry, > > I want a facet, a sidebar facet. But it is a "parameterized" facet. > It makes sense only together with a search filter "relation" > (dc.relation.*). > > There is an item A with dc.identifier=123. > The end-user makes search and adds the filter "relation = 123". > Because the end-user wants all items with some relation to item A. > > Only in this context the facet makes sense and it may be produced by > > &facet.query=relation.isbasedon:123 > &facet.query=relation.isformatof:123 > &facet.query=relation.isreferencedby:123 > > The value of the search (123) is the parameter of the facet. > > I mean - we make search for all items with any kind of relation to item A > (123). And we get a facet with the breakdown by the kind of relation to > item A. The facet makes sense and is possible only in pair with the search > filter "relation". > > Best regards > Evgeni > > > On Thursday, December 22, 2016 at 12:28:30 AM UTC+2, Terry Brady wrote: >> >> Are you attempting to create a query or to create a facet? >> >> If you are building a query, who will run the query? Does it need to be >> run through the DSpace UI, or can it be run in the background? >> >> Reading your initial note, it sounds like you would like to define a >> facet. Your initial plan to add a bean to discovery.xml should accomplish >> what you need. >> >> Assuming you want to create a facet, here are some suggestions. >> >> - If you wish to create a sidebar facet, add your new bean to the >> list of filters and to the list of sidebar facets. >> - After you deploy your updated discovery.xml file, you must re-index >> your repository for the filter/facet to take effect >> >> The following gist file illustrates a number of custom facets and filters >> that we have defined in our repository: https://gist.githu >> b.com/terrywbrady/d31fc1bcb9567204470f >> >> Terry >> >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 1:26 AM, Evgeni Dimitrov <dimitr...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi helix84, >>> >>> My thoughts are rather in this direction: >>> >>> To add somewhere? some code? so that only when the search filter >>> "relation" is applied (with value XXX), to have: >>> - a new temporary field relation_kind added - with value isformatof - >>> for every record with (relation.isformatof XXX) >>> - a new temporary field relation_kind added - with value isreferencedby >>> - for every record with (relation.isreferencedby XXX) >>> >>> And to have a facet over relation_kind. >>> >>> Anyway, if you think that this is not a viable option, could you please >>> elaborate on your initial suggestion. Where and how to use this query. And >>> where is this notation described. I have not seen anything similar. Thank >>> you again. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Evgeni >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 6:23:04 PM UTC+2, helix84 wrote: >>>> >>>> The query you want is: >>>> >>>> (relation.isbasedon:[* TO *] OR relation.isformatof:[* TO *] OR >>>> relation.isreferencedby:[* TO *]) AND your_identifier:123 >>>> >>>> Then use faceting as usual. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> ~~helix84 >>>> >>>> Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette >>>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Evgeni Dimitrov <dimitr...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I am wondering - is it possible to have a search like this: >>>>> >>>>> - to find all items, which have in any of >>>>> relation.isbasedon, relation.isformatof, relation.isreferencedby etc. >>>>> >>>>> certain value (the identifier of certain item); >>>>> >>>>> - then to have a facet "relation" with values >>>>> isbasedon (1) >>>>> isformatof (1) >>>>> isreferencedby (3) >>>>> >>>>> I mean - is it possible to have this without too much coding? I am >>>>> using xmlui - Mirage. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "DSpace Technical Support" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to dspace-tech...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to dspac...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-tech. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "DSpace Technical Support" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to dspace-tech...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to dspac...@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-tech. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Terry Brady >> Applications Programmer Analyst >> Georgetown University Library Information Technology >> http://georgetown-university-libraries.github.io/ >> <https://www.library.georgetown.edu/lit/code> >> 425-298-5498 <(425)%20298-5498> (Seattle, WA) >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "DSpace Technical Support" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to dspace-tech+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to dspace-tech@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-tech. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Terry Brady Applications Programmer Analyst Georgetown University Library Information Technology http://georgetown-university-libraries.github.io/ <https://www.library.georgetown.edu/lit/code> 425-298-5498 (Seattle, WA) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DSpace Technical Support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dspace-tech+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to dspace-tech@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/dspace-tech. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
