Hello,

I would like to ask for help about metadata-export in DSpace 9.3.

We have:

   - Production: *DSpace 7.6* 
   - Development: *DSpace 9.3* 

The development database was restored from production, so both environments 
should have the same data.

We run the same command in both environments:
bash
./dspace metadata-export -i d89fd0fe-7d8a-4850-85c5-c36687b25e1c -a -f 
/tmp/community-export.csv 

Results:

   - In *DSpace 7.6*, the export file is about *600 KB* 
   - In *DSpace 9.3*, the export file is about *330 KB* 

We also tested export by collection instead of community.
This community has only one collection, and the collection export in 9.3 is 
still much smaller than in 7.6.

What we have checked:

   - The dev database was copied from prod 
   - The same community / collection UUID is used 
   - The item count shown in the web UI is the same in both environments 
   - Some items that appear in the 7.6 export are missing from the 9.3 
   export 
   - But those missing items can still be found in the DSpace 9.3 web UI by 
   UUID 

So it seems the items exist and are visible in 9.3, but they are just not 
included in metadata-export.

I would like to ask:

   1. Is there any known change in metadata-export behavior between DSpace 
   7.6 and 9.3? 
   2. Does metadata-export in 9.3 filter items differently, for example by 
   archived / withdrawn / discoverable status? 
   3. Is this a known bug, or is there any additional 
   argument/configuration needed in 9.3? 

Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you.

Regards,
Martin

Librarian

HKUST

-- 
All messages to this mailing list should adhere to the Code of Conduct: 
https://lyrasis.org/code-of-conduct/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"DSpace Technical Support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dspace-tech/9f4ef66a-0cfa-415e-a783-eb66a7931099n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to