Sai Srinivas Dharanikota wrote:
> Scenario: We need to integrate DSpace as a  content repository for the
> *Metadata*, we have a registry to register the metadata. We need a
> repository to store this metadata. DSpace is used in this case. We
> have a prefix for every registry and repository (DSpace instance). All
> the handles are maintained by our handle server.
>
>
> Taken this scenario,
>
> Why do we get into hassle if we have a prefix for every DSpace
> instance with handles being generated by our handle server? Your
> comments would be helpful to correct our approach.

You don't need to; this is what Corey was suggesting.

You do have a problem if "All handles are maintained by our handle 
server" is a requirement, because out-of-the-box DSpace does not work as 
a client to a Handle server - it works as a Handle server itself. If you 
can have a prefix for each DSpace *and* let each DSpace resolve the 
handles for that prefix then there's no problem at all.


Best regards,

jim

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to