Is there a reason why only the metadata is stored in the database and not
the actual assetstore bitstreams? Has anyone considered changing the
physical storage from the filesystem to the database? I'm working on
building some redundancy into my infrastructure and it's looking like the
most efficient way to store the assetstore data in clustered configurations
would be in the database, especially when your database is already clustered
across multiple systems. Your database gets much larger, but you don't have
to worry about keeping your assetstores synchronized, etc.

Any thoughts? Anyone to blame? ;-)

Ryan

-- 
Ryan Ordway                          E-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix Systems Administrator             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSU Libraries, Corvallis, OR 97370        Office: Valley Library #4657



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to