On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:47:19PM -0400, Ekaterina Pechekhonova wrote: > +1 as it usually better to have more options then less. > However, in our repository we keep identifiers on item level as we > see item as a repository "atomic" structure, and we think it's pretty > important that file identifiers will be an option not a default.
Do you actually oppose assigning them, or just making them visible to the user? Naturally the "citation link" would be exactly as it is now (ie: pointing to an Item). Personally, I can't see any reason why having this information available would be harmful, so I'm interested to understand why you might think it was a bad idea (I'm very open to input here). cheers, Jim -- James Rutherford | Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Research Engineer | Cain Road, HP Labs | Bracknell, Bristol, UK | Berks +44 117 312 7066 | RG12 1HN. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Registered No: 690597 England The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error, you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the sender. To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise stated you should consider this message and attachments as "HP CONFIDENTIAL". ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
