Hi Stuart
The section you mentioned was commented out.
1) I stopped tomcat, removed the comments from the relevant sectio of
dspace.cfg, updated dspace, rebuilt the indexes and restarted tomcat.
Following these modifications on the test server 1.6.2 the dates are
still shown correctly under Edit item, but as before truncated
everywhere else under issue date.
2) I then stopped tomcat, and modified the line you mentioned in
dspace.cfg as follows:
webui.itemdisplay.default = dc.title, dc.title.alternative, dc.contributor.*, \
dc.subject, dc.date.issued, dc.publisher, \
dc.identifier.citation,
dc.relation.ispartofseries, \
dc.description.abstract, dc.description, \
dc.identifier.govdoc, dc.identifier.uri(link), \
dc.identifier.isbn, dc.identifier.issn, \
dc.identifier.ismn, dc.identifier
I then updated dspace, rebuilt the indexes and restarted tomcat.
The full, unabridged issue date is now shown as you can see below:
http://standbyvle.bromley.ac.uk/dspace/handle/2045/16
So what is it about (date) ???
Thanks ;)
Clive
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Stuart Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Clive,
>
>> Here is an item in our restored 1.5.2 production server:
>>
>> http://vle.bromley.ac.uk/dspace/handle/2045/22
>>
>> and here is the same item in our 1.6.2 test server:
>>
>> http://standbyvle.bromley.ac.uk/dspace/handle/2045/22
>
> OK - so looks like the data is definitely fine in the database because when
> you compare the 'full item view' in both, the date stamps are the same. So
> the DB seems fine.
>
> There were some large-ish changes made to a class called DCDate in the 1.5.2
> -> 1.6 upgrade, and this may be causing the problem, however we've not had
> this problem reported before (I think!) other than by yourself and Rajshekar.
>
> What do you have in dpsace.cfg for:
>
> webui.itemdisplay.default = dc.title, dc.title.alternative, dc.contributor.*,
> \
> dc.subject, dc.date.issued(date), dc.publisher, \
> dc.identifier.citation,
> dc.relation.ispartofseries, \
> dc.description.abstract, dc.description, \
> dc.identifier.govdoc, dc.identifier.uri(link), \
> dc.identifier.isbn, dc.identifier.issn, \
> dc.identifier.ismn, dc.identifier
>
> By default this section is commented out. I wonder what happens if you remove
> the '(date)' from dc.date.issued, (and uncomment it if needed) and try
> restarting tomcat. This may help us narrow down where the problem is, as it
> will display the date as a raw string, rather than as a formatted date.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Stuart Lewis
> IT Innovations Analyst and Developer
> Te Tumu Herenga The University of Auckland Library
> Auckland Mail Centre, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
> Ph: +64 (0)9 373 7599 x81928
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
