Hi All

This is what we did.
http://wiki.lib.sun.ac.za/index.php/SUNScholar/Asset_Embargo

Cheers

hg

On 09/09/2010 18:08, Tim Donohue wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> What I mean by preconfigure is the following:
>
> (1) Pre-create embargo metadata fields which DSpace will use by default,
> and pre-configure them in dspace.cfg as the default settings.  (People
> can always change these fields as needed -- and although there is no DC
> profile/standard for this, DSpace already doesn't fully follow DC
> profiles/standards for metadata)
>
> (2) Based on #1, pre-configure the metadata fields in input-forms.xml
> (but comment them out by default).
>
> The problem to me seems to be that it's a bit too complex and roundabout
> to enable embargoes (especially for non-technical users).  Currently,
> you need to know that there are 3 separate steps (create fields, updated
> dspace.cfg, and know how to add the fields properly to input-forms).  I
> think it'd make it much easier for non-techies if we can simplify to one
> step -- just uncomment the fields in input-forms.xml.   The techies can
> still chose to change the default metadata fields or other settings --
> but, at least we aren't creating as much of a barrier for others.
>
> It just seems like there's some sort of obvious barrier here -- and I
> don't think it's just a documentation problem. A quick search of
> 'dspace-tech' archives shows 64 messages with a subject of "embargo"
> this year -- most of which are questions about how to enable it and get
> it to work right.  I've heard similar questions off list as well.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/search?a=1&l=dspace-tech%40lists.sourceforge.net&haswords=embargo&from=&notwords=&subject=&datewithin=1y&date=09%2F09%2F10&order=relevance&search=Search
>
> Just my thoughts...
>
> - Tim
>
> On 9/9/2010 10:54 AM, Richard Rodgers wrote:
>> Hi Tim:
>>
>> Just a remark below:
>>
>> Richard
>> On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Tim Donohue wrote:
>>
>>> I'd actually go one further and say:
>>>
>>> (1) We should update the manual to make clearer (like Mark suggests)
>>>
>>>    AND
>>>
>>> (2) We should work to ship 1.7 with a default embargo already setup
>>> (i.e. pre-configured) -- so that all you need to do is update
>> I'm not sure what you mean - it *is* already enabled (i.e, the setter&   
>> lifter are functional)
>> the only thing you need to do is decide on which metadata fields the terms&  
>>  lift will map to.
>> Are you saying we want to legislate those? There is no DC profile etc 
>> standard that I'm aware of for
>> embargo terms.
>>
>> Or do you simply mean we should put xml comments in input_forms.xml? Like:
>>
>> <!--  make sure the terms appear here -->
>>
>> Can you explain what you mean by pre-configure?
>>
>>> input-forms.xml and uncomment the pre-configured embargo field(s).  If
>>> an institution doesn't like the pre-configured version, they can always
>>> modify it to use different fields or have different values, etc.
>>>
>>> What do others think?  Should a pre-configured version be in 1.7?
>>>
>>> It seems like this question keeps popping up over and over again in
>>> different forms (e.g. "how do I enable it?", "how does it work?", etc.)
>>>    Might be best to make this easier for everyone with a pre-configured
>>> version -- and let them decide if they want to extend it or not.
>>>
>>> - Tim
>>>
>>> On 9/9/2010 10:10 AM, Mark H. Wood wrote:
>>>> I worked over the Javadoc in the embargo package, to improve my
>>>> understanding and (I hope) to fill in the overall process and
>>>> requirements a bit.  Committed revision 5342.
>>>>
>>>> The new package comments might serve as an appropriate starting point for
>>>> expanding the manual in this area.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>>>>
>>>> Show off your parallel programming skills.
>>>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> DSpace-tech mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>>>
>>> Show off your parallel programming skills.
>>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DSpace-tech mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
>
> Show off your parallel programming skills.
> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
> _______________________________________________
> DSpace-tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to