Thanks for that! I'm looking around for schemas that I could base mine on, but 
there are a bunch of terms crucial to this repository that are specific to 
Indian Music and although I had hoped there might be a schema that incorporates 
them, there really doesn't seem to be (I've searched high and low!)

I don intend to create a local namespace, although I hadn't considered 
documenting it thoroughly like you recommend. I will now! I also ought to make 
the documentation public somewhere, right? On our repository's public website 
perhaps?

Thanks!
-Srijan

On Monday 13 June 2011 at 7:03 PM, Mark H. Wood wrote:

> [rant]
> 
> In general I think that one should not extend the 'dc' namespace which
> ships with DSpace, but follow a procedure like this:
> 
> 1) look around for one or more suitable schemas which already define
>  the attributes you wish to represent. If you find them, use
>  them. DSpace supports well any reasonable number of schemas (so
>  long as they can be mapped to a 1- or 2-level hierarchy).
> 
> 2) create one or more local namespaces to hold any attributes which
>  are unique to your collection(s). Document these thoroughly, as
>  if you were a standards body. Consider whether your requirements
>  are really unique or only generally unmet -- you might wish to
>  offer your work for others to use and extend.
> 
> One should always try to use existing schemas if this is practical,
> because their terms have agreed-upon meaning. Consider: if
> information on your holdings is harvested by another site, how will
> the harvester understand the attributes you have added?
> 
> If you must create new namespaces, publish your specifications so that
> others will be able to understand and use them.
> 
> [end rant]
> 
> There has been some discussion of making DSpace's 'dc' schema
> immutable for just such reasons, and of shipping additional
> widely-used schemas (not yet identified) with the product.
> 
> -- 
> Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> Asking whether markets are efficient is like asking whether people are smart.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> DSpace-tech mailing list
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
> 
> Attachments: 
> - smime.p7s
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech

Reply via email to