On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Mark Ludwig <[email protected]> wrote: > You confirmed what I suspected. This project may call for a separate > instance because of the need to separate the indexing.
Right, but do consider running both DSpace instances on the same DSpace code, like I wrote. It should make maintenance easier unless you plan to deprecate the archive and not update it's DSpace anymore. > With our large collections, the only available metadata is in the filenames > and it just takes too much heads-down scripting and script running to > clean up filenames and produce good Dublin core XML. I think all repository managers who are trying to ensure even basic metadata quality can attest to that it takes much more time to get that right than the technical aspects alone. So by no means you're alone. :) Regards, ~~helix84 Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
