On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Andrea Bollini <a.boll...@cineca.it> wrote: > As I haven't received yet any feedback or comment I'm trying to get more > visibility on the tech list. > Please note that imho it is very important for the consistent of the DSpace > data model that we all agree about standard scope and usage of item state.
Hi Andrea, I think the reason you didn't get feedback is that you're describing how things should work, while it's not completely clear how it differs from how things currently work. To get feedback, you should describe the status quo, why it is not ideal and propose a change. For example, I notice that no interface except XMLUI currently doesn't respects the "discoverable" attribute (the private state). It's clear that this is a problem. So the proposal should say whether we should add support to all other interfaces or wait for a more final solution and what that would be. I know this is a lot of work and I appreciate you started looking into it, thank you. Regards, ~~helix84 Compulsory reading: DSpace Mailing List Etiquette https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
