On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:28:35AM +0000, Webshet, Sisay (ILRI) wrote: > Dsapce 3.1/xmlui version.so far we are using 'dc.element.qualifier' format in > order to create dspace fields.
Many sites have done this. We should not have. Dublin Core is defined by DCMI and the rest of us shouldn't be changing it. > Is there a problem if I replace the term'dc' with some other term cg to > form 'cg.element.qualifier' No, that is what *should* be done when a site needs to extend the metadata model. But it is a bit more work. You need to create a new metadata namespace. (DSpace calls this a "schema", but this use of the term is disputed.) On the page listing metadata namespaces you'll need to "Add a new schema". Your local schema will need a unique namespace URI, but it does not need to resolve to any document. You can use "cg" for the name. Once this is completed, your new namespace should appear above in the metadata registry. Select it as you would "dc" and define the fields you need. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [email protected] Machines should not be friendly. Machines should be obedient.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
