On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:00:00PM +0200, Bram Luyten wrote:
> Interesting, thank you for reporting back Stuart.
> It's good to know that downtime in the past can trigger exclusion.

This gave me to think.  We have done quite some work to exclude
spiders from the usage statistics, but I wonder if we could use those
same judgments to generate periodic reports showing *only* who is
spidering a site, and perhaps how often or how aggressively.  It might
be useful for e.g. noticing that a desired spider is *not* listed.

-- 
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer   [email protected]
Machines should not be friendly.  Machines should be obedient.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette

Reply via email to