Hi Peter, Unless you've heard otherwise, I'd recommend we remove the SRB storage implementation. It's a very outdated implementation and (from my knowledge) has been unused and unmaintained for some time.
SRB itself seems to have faded from existence. Nearly all the external links on the SRB Wikipedia page are dead at this point (even the ones from SDSC who built SRB back in the day): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_Resource_Broker That seems to imply that SRB itself is really not maintained. - Tim On 6/5/2015 5:28 PM, Peter Dietz wrote: > Hi All, > > I've added Pull Request that refactors the bitstream storage manager, to > provide implementations such as AWS S3, eventually for DSpace 6. > https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/pull/960 > > One assetstore implementation that was kind of wedged in to DSpace is > SRB Storage Resource Broker. I was wondering if this storage system was > still in use, and / or if anyone is still using DSpace with SRB? > ________________ > Peter Dietz > Longsight > www.longsight.com <http://www.longsight.com> > pe...@longsight.com <mailto:pe...@longsight.com> > p: 740-599-5005 x809 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > DSpace-tech mailing list > DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech > List Etiquette: > https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ DSpace-tech mailing list DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette