Hi Peter,

Unless you've heard otherwise, I'd recommend we remove the SRB storage 
implementation. It's a very outdated implementation and (from my 
knowledge) has been unused and unmaintained for some time.

SRB itself seems to have faded from existence. Nearly all the external 
links on the SRB Wikipedia page are dead at this point (even the ones 
from SDSC who built SRB back in the day):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_Resource_Broker

That seems to imply that SRB itself is really not maintained.

- Tim

On 6/5/2015 5:28 PM, Peter Dietz wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've added Pull Request that refactors the bitstream storage manager, to
> provide implementations such as AWS S3, eventually for DSpace 6.
> https://github.com/DSpace/DSpace/pull/960
>
> One assetstore implementation that was kind of wedged in to DSpace is
> SRB Storage Resource Broker. I was wondering if this storage system was
> still in use, and / or if anyone is still using DSpace with SRB?
> ________________
> Peter Dietz
> Longsight
> www.longsight.com <http://www.longsight.com>
> pe...@longsight.com <mailto:pe...@longsight.com>
> p: 740-599-5005 x809
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DSpace-tech mailing list
> DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
> List Etiquette: 
> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
DSpace-tech mailing list
DSpace-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspace-tech
List Etiquette: https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACE/Mailing+List+Etiquette

Reply via email to