On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 01:37:38 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 1 - They seem to implement some small changes in the configuration 
> layout of dspam, which i personally think as improvements, and didn't 
> seem to be a bit too much the "debian way".

I object to including to config changes:
- I don't see the need for it, dspam's .conf file is simpler/shorter
enough to need more that one file.
- it brings in unneeded overhead (dir/file reading)
- the way it is now it's distro specific (/etc/dspam/dspam.d/) so if
this would go in it should respect via ./configure the PREFIX and the
'dspam.d' should be also configurable (there's no such thing on BSDs).
so if this needed (required by hier(7) or something) on debian and it
needs to be included upstream develop the patch to work for the rest of
us as well.


The rest of them seem OK.

-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to