-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:43:23 +0200 > Von: Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> > An: Steve <steeeeev...@gmx.net> > CC: dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM preferences
> Hello Steve, > > Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 à 21:31 +0200, Steve a écrit : > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > > Datum: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:34:39 +0200 > > > Von: Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> > > > An: dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > Betreff: [Dspam-devel] DSPAM preferences > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Following to Stevan's suggestion in the discussion around sf bug > > > #2824760: > > > I would say that the logic regarding preferences should be: > > > Priority 1) User preferences > > > Priority 2) Use group preferences > > > Priority 3) Use default preferences (uid 0) > > > Fallback) Use preferences from dspam.conf > > > > > > I take the leave to ask the following: I have never really > experimented > > > with default.prefs files. > [...] > > > > That is pretty much what "dspam_admin aggregate preference <user>" does > but it does it regardless of the presence of the preference extension. > > Thanks a lot for your detailed explanations. I will experiment tonight > to be sure I understand everything correctly. > Already, I am wondering if it is worth keeping so many different ways to > set default preferences? > I can't decide that. Why would you remove additional ways to set preferences? > Cheers, > Julien > Steve -- Neu: GMX Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
