On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:09:31 +0200, "Steve" <steeeeev...@gmx.net> wrote: > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:41:35 -0400 >> Von: "Edgar Díaz Orellana" <eorel...@fulltimehosting.net> >> An: dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> Betreff: [Dspam-devel] FEATURE REQUEST. DKIM Signature @Dspam. > >> >> >> Hi everyone. i'm guessing if it's possible to implement a class of >> plug-in of DKIM when the email was passing out from email server to >> external sites, then could be signed by DKIM or something related like >> amavis could do currently. i'm waiting to hear your comments.
Hi steve > Are you able to rephrase that question. I don't understand what you really > want. When you write about DKIM then you mean that DSPAM should sign a mail > with DKIM? Or do you mean a way to use DKIM signing (and verifying) but not > to use Amavisd-New. Right? Mainly i'm try to found some way to implement a kind of pluggin of DKIM or some other programs connected like pluggins, that means 2 requests really. first, create a kind of interface to connect pluggins, i'm not sure how do that, honestly. second, connect DKIM for checking incomming emails with and without signing, if not signed, got's 20 points of spam, or some weight of spam, the others signed and verified get passed or get negative points, but remember a lot of spammers use gmail servers to send spam, that means a lot of missed emails pass to mailbox without marks of spam. another plugging is SFP pluggin, like wise DKIM, is another validation tool for emails. think about that features. > > If you need DKIM signing/verifying but don't want to use Amavisd-New then > have a look at: > DKIM Milter -> http://sourceforge.net/projects/dkim-milter/ > OpenDKIM -> http://www.opendkim.org/ > > I am using both of them on various Postfix installations without any > problem. I would however suggest you to go with OpenDKIM since it is done > by the same developer who has made dkim-milter and opendkim is going to be > the package where he is focusing more in the future. > currently i'm using dkfilter, but performance is always bad, the check and sign process take always a few seconds. that's i'm think in a inprocess plugin for dkim or some related program. or maybe a socket implementation like clam-av. i don't know, just it's an idea! > >> greetings to >> everyone. edgar >> > Steve Edgar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel