Hallo Carlo, > No, I didn't mean to 'force' them into quarantine. Only to deliver them > into quarantine, _if quarantine is being used_. > Aha. Okay. The quarantine function currently only fires in case of "virus", "spam", "blacklisted" and "blocklisted". We would need then to add an additional tag for invalid messages.
> That's what I meant; to treat them the same way as viruses. If > quarantine is active, quarantine them (just in case someone wants to > inspect them). If not, just tag the message as Invalid in webui and > discard the message. > Writing log for invalid in WebUI makes no big sense if the message is discarted. > They're not forced. I think. > > I looked in the code. No forcing of quarantine delivery is happening. > I see. But the only way to avoid that is to return no error, right? > Depends. Some MTA's accept error codes that instruct them to hold back the mail (so they stay in queue). > 3.2% to %0.17 -> almost 19 times more effective. > > Or to say it the other way: If 3.8.0 as well had 0.17% then 3.9.0 is again back on the same level as 3.8.0. I was the one ripping out the old and buggy HTML parsing code and replaced it with a new one. It could be very well be that I influenced the failure rate to be 19 times less effective then 3.8.0. You never know. > >> Best Regards, > >> Carlo Rodrigues > >> > >> > -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
