Feature Requests item #2939578, was opened at 2010-01-25 18:45 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sbajic You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126468&aid=2939578&group_id=250683
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Enrico Scholz (ensc) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Create an unique but determined signature Initial Comment: I am going to use 'dspam' from within a milter where a message is often checked for multiple recipients. Currently, every recipient will get another signature and message must be cloned for every recipient to add the corresponding signature. Things are even worse when two recipients are resolved to the same user by external lookup. Then, message is processed twice by 'dspam' but user is told only one signature. Hence, it would be nice when a message creates always the same signature. Returning a SHA1 based HMAC code (see RFC 2104) of the message and a configurable secret key would be perfect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Stevan Bajic (sbajic) Date: 2010-02-19 20:20 Message: Why can a DSPAM signature (as it is today) not be added into the headers? Each user has normally in DSPAM his on storage and training/retraining with a signature is going to switch tokens for the user. If you want the signature to stay persistent per message then just use one DSPAM user to classify/process the message and then deliver from your Milter to each user, adding the same DSPAM signature to the header and set your training alias to be executed under the DSPAM user you used when classifying/processing the message. Or use something like shared groups in DSPAM. If I understand you right then your goal is to have just one signature per mail and you don't care if inside the DSPAM database the data is saved multiple times (for each user once) as long as the signature stays the same. Right? Adding something like that could be possible but stuff like UID in signature would then not work. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Enrico Scholz (ensc) Date: 2010-02-19 19:20 Message: I want that users can force dspam to relearn a message. Relearning requires knowledge about the signature but because the signature is different for every recipient it can not be added to the e-mail headers. Hence, there is no way how users can relearn a message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Stevan Bajic (sbajic) Date: 2010-02-19 18:40 Message: Hallo Enrico, what issue are you expecting to solve with one unique signature per message? The current database schema can not attach multiple UID's to one signature. -- Kind Regards from Switzerland, Stevan Bajić ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126468&aid=2939578&group_id=250683 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
