On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:45:50 +0100
Hugo Monteiro <hugo.monte...@fct.unl.pt> wrote:

> Hello all.
> 
Hallo Hugo,


> Stevan, you might be able to answer this one.
> 
I can try. If it is something with DSPAM then I sure can answer it :)


> When using client/daemon mode, communication usually is done through 
> DLMTP right?
> 
Yes.


> Happens that i was testing some stuff and i found out that if i use a 
> non email address in the --user part, the server refuses to process the 
> message.
> 
> --- snip ---
> 
> @400000004bc885010c7d7ca4 12725: [04/16/2010 16:40:39] process mode: 
> '--client --stdout --deliver=innocent,spam '
> @400000004bc885010c7dea04 12725: [04/16/2010 16:40:39] SEND: 250 2.1.0 OK
> @400000004bc88501114005f4 12725: [04/16/2010 16:40:39] SRECV: RCPT TO: <hm>
> @400000004bc8850111400dc4
> @400000004bc8850111409294 12725: [04/16/2010 16:40:39] SEND: 503 5.1.2 
> Invalid RCPT TO. Use RCPT TO: <recipient>
> @400000004bc885011604aa54 12725: [04/16/2010 16:40:39] SRECV: QUIT
> @400000004bc885011604b224
> @400000004bc8850116052b3c 12725: [04/16/2010 16:40:39] SEND: 250 2.0.0 OK
> 
> --- snip ---
> 
> 
> I've tracked it down to daemon.c
> 
>          if (_ds_extract_address(username, cmdline, sizeof(username)) ||
>              username[0] == 0 || username[0] == '-' || username[0] == '@' ||
>              _ds_validate_address(username) == 0)
>          {
>            daemon_reply(TTX, LMTP_BAD_CMD, "5.1.2", ERR_LMTP_BAD_RCPT);
>            goto GETCMD;
>          }
> 
> 
> and the only one that i can associate with a failure, while providing 
> --user hm, is _ds_validate_address()
> 
> 
> In fact, in _ds_validate_address(), right in the middle we find
> 
>    /* Next validate the domain part (local_p...@domain_part.tld) */
>    if (!*(domain = ++p)) return 0;
> 
> 
> Please correct me if i'm wrong, but appears that in client/daemon mode, 
> at the moment, only email addresses are supported.
> 
Right. At the moment only email addresses work when using client/daemon mode. 
But only the GIT version has this limitation. The current 3.9.0 version does 
not have that restriction. I need however to fix that before releasing 3.9.1. 
It's on my todo list (which is longer then long).


> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hugo Monteiro.
> 
-- 
Kind Regards from Switzerland,

Stevan Bajić

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel

Reply via email to