On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:55:45PM +0200, Stevan Baji?? wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:47:36 +0200 (CEST)
> "Imposit.com - webmaster" <webmas...@imposit.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > Can it be that the message is wrongly sent by your delivery agent?
> > > Does your delivery agent escapes single lines with a dot?
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Negative. There was no change in that since dspam 380. its comming from 
> > postfix directly.
> > theres nothing to change anyting inside a message except dspam :-)
> > 
> > also when i train by an alias (forward an mail) its getting retrained - so 
> > no errors here
> > only if a message is in the quarantine it cant be forwarded
> > 
> > heres the corpus of debug.
> > i could also attach the quarantine with one message in but i dont wanna 
> > flood here everyone :-)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Return-Path: <qyjys8...@romtelecom.net>
> > X-Original-To: off...@latak-gefluegelimbiss.at
> > Delivered-To: whatever
> > Received: from romtelecom.net (unknown [0.0.0.0])
> >         by example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36184E200EF
> >         for <off...@example.com>; Fri,  6 Aug 2010 14:38:57 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: <qyjys8...@romtelecom.net>
> > To: off...@example.com
> > Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:39:03 +0300
> > Subject: Exotic women shaven
> > Reply-To: <qyjys8...@romtelecom.net>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> > Message-Id: <20100806123857.36184e20...@mail.saurid.com>
> > X-DSPAM-Result: Spam
> > X-DSPAM-Processed: Fri Aug  6 14:38:57 2010
> > X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.6166
> > X-DSPAM-Probability: 1.0000
> > X-DSPAM-Signature: 1043,4c5c0261314946605615499
> > X-DSPAM-Factors: 15,
> >         Delivered-To*user+example.com, 0.99000,
> >         the+#+by, 0.99000,
> >         X-Original-To*office+latak-gefluegelimbiss.at, 0.99000,
> >         inches+to, 0.99000,
> >         Url*ru/, 0.99000,
> >         To*office+latak-gefluegelimbiss.at, 0.99000,
> >         3+inches, 0.99000,
> >         to+your, 0.07946,
> >         Url*//www, 0.11725,
> >         *Aug+#+14, 0.14768,
> >         with+the, 0.19709,
> >         Url*http, 0.22143,
> >         *From+#+#+#+Aug, 0.27335,
> >         with+#+#+#+adding, 0.40000,
> >         Subject*Exotic+#+shaven, 0.40000
> > Make miracles happen with the ladies by adding 3 inches to your weiner.
> > http://www.dadchief.ru/
> > !DSPAM:1043,4c5c0261314946605615499!
> > 
> File a bug at Postfix. The message is not valid. According to RFC there MUST 
> be a empty line between header and body. The above message DOES NOT HAVE THIS!
> 

One thing that would help to debug this problem is to save the mail that
is sent to DSPAM to a folder unadulterated. Otherwise, it will be impossible
to figure out where the problem lies. I have chased similar bugs in the
past and they have not ended up being in postfix, but in one of the other
mail transports. If we have a copy of the original message, we can see where
it is mangled in transport and find the problem.

Regards,
Ken


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by 

Make an app they can't live without
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Dspam-devel mailing list
Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel

Reply via email to