On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:24:07 +0200 (CEST) "Imposit.com - webmaster" <webmas...@imposit.com> wrote:
> Hmm openvpn do it that way > > Thu Jul 07 23:08:47 2005 Cannot load certificate file > D:\programme\openvpn\confi > g\client.crt: error:0906D06C:PEM routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line: > error:140A > D009:SSL routines:SSL_CTX_use_certificate_file:PEM lib > > that is what i ment :-) > adantage of this is that sometimes "cannot load" doesnt mean nessesary file > is not there, ther ecould be another issue > here you see every involed function which maybe lead to a false understood > error msg > > but it doenst matter, yes bit more human readable will reduce the need of > additional help > or make it a lot easier to help. Honnestly error -5 hmm lets guess :-) > Just looking at error -5 is not the whole picture. Look at this: [....] 22916: [08/08/2010 15:08:10] _pgsql_drv_getpwnam: returning NULL for query on name: classicifation_user that returned a null result 22916: [08/08/2010 15:08:10] _pgsql_drv_get_spamtotals: unable to _pgsql_drv_getpwnam(classicifation_user) 22916: [08/08/2010 15:08:10] _ds_init_storage: unable to load totals. Using zero values. [....] 22916: [08/08/2010 15:08:10] _pgsql_drv_getpwnam: returning NULL for query on name: classicifation_user that returned a null result 22916: [08/08/2010 15:08:10] _ds_getall_spamrecords: unable to _pgsql_drv_getpwnam(classicifation_user) 22916: [08/08/2010 15:08:10] _ds_getall_spamrecords() failed 22916: [08/08/2010 15:08:10] user_classify() returned error -5 [....] So it is clear that classicifation_user does not exist (returning NULL). > or make just errorcodes and we offer professional support and charge it lol > of course in that case we change those codes every 2 weeks... > sorry just a few evil thoughts - yes microsoft shoud hire me > One solution: Stop using their products. > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Stevan Bajić [mailto:ste...@bajic.ch] > Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2010 13:57 > An: dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] Auto-discard notification > > On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:22:40 +0000 > "Imposit.com - Webmaster" <webmas...@imposit.com> wrote: > > > I would say a function for error Handling with an optional argument > > errorcode where is needed. > > The errorcode can be translated in the function to something human > > readable > > > Okay. So you are all for extending the current functions to return more then > just plain success/failure? > > > > on the other hand the idea slo the whole chain for the error is not bad. > > openvpn do it that way > > is a bit cryptic to read but if you read carefully you know exactly what > > is > > wrong > > > This is the way how it is now implemented in DSPAM. > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Stevan Bajić [mailto:ste...@bajic.ch] > > Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2010 11:48 > > An: dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Betreff: Re: [Dspam-devel] 3.9.1-rc1: issue with classification user > > > > On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:31:34 +0100 > > Paul Cockings <ds...@cytringan.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > Stevan Bajić wrote: > > > > > > > > {function a} -[calling]-> {function b} -[calling]-> {function > > > > c} -[calling]-> {function d} > > > > | > > > > +[calling]-> {function e} -[calling]-> {function d} > > > > | > > > > +[calling]-> {function f} > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the reason I wrote "it is not that simple". > > > > > > > > > > I love your explanations, so clear and easy to understand. :-) .. a > > > true expert. > > > > > > If there was skill, time and motivation to change this, what would be > > > the correct solution in your opinion? > > > > > "Correct solution"? It's hard to tell. Mainly because you can not just > > look > > at one problem and say that this or that is the correct solution. You need > > to look at the whole solution/code in order to say what would be the best > > solution. > > > > > > > 1. Stay with 'a bunch of functions' but add better error communication > > > between functions > > > > > This will probably break the purpose of libdspam. > > > > > > > 2. Rewrite the complete structure using something other than 'a bunch of > > > functions' (aka Dspam 4 along with a LOT of other things half > > > discussed) > > > > > That could be one way of solving that issue. I don't mean just rewriting > > the > > functions but rewrite the way how errors are passed from one function to > > the > > other. Maybe unifying the error codes so that functions don't just return > > success/failure but do more. Another way would be to create something like > > a > > stacked/logged error queue. Something where the calling "function a" could > > then evaluate the whole calling path and then be able to print out that it > > failed because of this and that and not be just limited to know that > > "function b" has failed. > > > > > > > Forgive me if the question has an obvious answer (in a developers eyes) > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > > > > > Make an app they can't live without > > > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Dspam-devel mailing list > > > Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > > > Make an app they can't live without > > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Dspam-devel mailing list > > Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-devel mailing list > Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Dspam-devel mailing list > Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Dspam-devel mailing list Dspam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-devel
